Wednesday, 13 June 2007

Meme pool: Ideas to expand >>>>



  • Family is a human social invention, achieved first in farming communities, supported by respect of all members of the community.
  • Definition of Family: A fundamental social group in society typically consisting of one or two parents and their children.
  • Secular scholars have taken Family as a moral concept, and not as a human social achievement. This attitude has left religions as the main if not exclusive guardian of the Family. In fact, religions are the only institutions that are defending family values against non religious schools of taught. However when it comes to a situation that a selection between the values of the church and family becomes necessary; then of course they put family values for at par with the benefit of the institution of the religion.
  • Another factor affecting the modern Euro-American family was the Industrial Revolution, which removed from the home to the factory many economic tasks, such as baking, spinning, and weaving. Economic and social conditions have discouraged the presence of the husband and father in the home; in industrial communities the wife and mother also is often employed outside the home, leaving the children to be cared for by others. Sociologists and psychologists find in these changed relations of the members of the family to each other and of the family to the community at large, the source of many problems such as divorce, mental illness, and juvenile delinquency.
  • In the meantime, Religious fundamentalists are winning because Family is threatened by the Industrial lifestyle without a comparable upgrading of creating opportunities for Family by modernity.
  • Family features and functions by modernity. Modernization vs modern philosophies.
  • Family is like human rain forest, which political, religious, economical, military powers, are harvesting without a sustainable view.

  • What percentage of human economy and needs pass through families?
  • Secular scholars have not regarded family as the most valuable social achievement of human beings and have left Family as a morale concept.   Therefore protection of Family institution is taken as religions' exclusive territory.
  • One of the most important roles of modern economy is converting more and more of human activities into an economical activity. The result is taking away more and more of in house family operations for living, like preparation, production and services done in the family for the family by the family. The family activities are taken away bit by bit by the industrial system to produce more profit entities. The result is that families do the same thing BUT out side the families. They can not share experiences while doing it. The individual experiences are separate. Family experiences are shared in less and less available time. As a result there is a vast space available for non family ideas to develop in the individuals. The main result is that humans are losing their individuality of life. In exchange they each get an individual bank account. And a separate pay check, to pay for mass produced, mass marketed products.
  • Modern Law has retained strongly, the flow of OWNERSHIP in the families. That is rather the only place where family values are protected.
  • Environmental: The good of Family is the good of environment. Waste is not acceptable to Family. It has proved acceptable to profit and competition economy.
  • Competition: is acceptable for families where it generates more strength to the members to serve better. NOT to endanger the members or others for winning a name. (expand this to reflect how COMPETITION is destroying the earth through waste and pollution, for the sake of PROFIT and POWER. Family values of respecting the home and humans can stop this.
  • Philosophical:
  • Family is the greater good, keeps independence and freedom of individual & children intact.
  • The dialectics
The methods of production has affected the way families live. In early human tribes, personal Family was not the right of all. Having families was the highest demand of Slaves. Serfs had families but how equal to the family values of the lords?
    • Family right for all including labours was what industrialists gave serfs and took over the power.
  • Modernism: Families want to be together as they wish even 100% of time. Social Power is generated by taking time off family and taking other possible resources generated by the families, OUT of FAMILY in exchange for what they need MOST.
    • Generating fear (of life, future of children, resources, afterlife, morality, ranking, unknown….) in the families is the basis of power of:
    • Greater good mongers
    • Religions and political powers.
    • Armies
  • Non family objectives have left power in the hands of so called guardians of the society. Given leadership to SPECIALISTS: economists, Generals, churches, economists…etc…
  • Economical power (MONEY) is generated by keeping resources away from families and exchanging it with the time and effort of the individual members of the family.
  • The need has taken families away from each other….during the day, expatriates, merchants, armies….
  • Different ways modern life takes time off families.
o Consumerism demands more and more out of family time.
o promoting and accommodating living as a single bachelor Extending the transition time a young adult spends to become independent and feel ready for creation of new family……
  • Practical facts:
    • Good life from Childhood to Old age is best in Family.
    • Education, nourishment, keeping safe, growth for individual children.
    • Best pool of resources,
    • best sustainable pleasures
    • most economical expenditure.
    • Best health and hygiene
  • EXISTING THEORIES AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS FAMILY:
  • ASK political parties….
  • SOCIALISTs and family?
  • Where does family stand in European socialist theories.
  • They have ousted family to moral values in their theoretical analysis. IN spite of all their humanistic, they have deprived themselves from the core of human society, Family. So the instability and weakness against capitalist values. Capitalists have adhered their OWNERSHIP to the family core and principles through inheritance so they have been able to sustain their grip to societies and expand, even their human values are low.
  • What’s the definition of society? What is the first cell of society.
  • Individual human  >>>   family >>>> society…. other societies…
  • Or
  • Individual>>>>>>>>>society…….????
  • Or
  • Individual  >>>> institutions >>>> society
  • Or
  • Individual  >>> MONEY  >>>> society
  • HISTORY:
  • 1st being  >>>> 1st energy  >>>> 1st mass >>>> 1st atom  >>>>> 1st molecule  >>>> 1st DNA >>>> 1st single cell  >>>> 1st multi cell  >>>>> 1st individual  >>>>> FAMILY >>> society.
  • DNA  >>>>  first single cell >>>> group single cells >>>> multi cell >>>>> social insects  HERDS >>>>  social animals >>>>> human societies.
  • Are human societies sustainable without families?
  • Is final common more achievable with the concept of family?
  • Family communist party
  • Family socialist Party
  • Family Capitalist parties
  • Family religious parties
  • Family democratic party.
  • Is final common achievable without family? Is it going to be sustainable? Is family going to be an option there without creating conflicts?
  • Will family concept continue to be a source of conflict?
  • Does family have to be a source of conflict in final common?
  • IF YES: So lets get rid family concept now? Or not invest on it now?
  • LETS DEFINE:
  • Clan families, barbaric families, Civil families.
  • Individual families, bonku families khan families, mafia families, citizen families… world families.
  • Existing social family structures in tribal, Sheppard, agricultural, merchant towns, industrial towns, industrial countries……
  • Natural societies…in countries, continents.
  • Family needs:
  • Food, clothing, residence, health, peace.
  • Needs of woman
  • Man
  • Children
  • Advantages of family
  • For individual……….Check hierarchy of needs with psychology ….
  • Materialistic:
  • …Genetic imperative, getting the best nourishment compared to adults, getting a fair sharing system for resources, best space to grow, individual protectors, one to one training.
  • …exclusive rights, independence, security of storage, security of future, safety of women, children and vulnerable.
  • Emotional:
  • …Feeling of love, being loved, feeling exceptional, emotional security, feeling belonged, eradication of loneliness.
  • …Feeling of importance: One to one relationship
  • …Quality of life…personal goals, trust,
  • …Personal Economy: get job training, start business, management, access to funds,
  • For society
  • Dealing with responsible people… best use of resources, fair distribution from adults to children, effectiveness of education, enrichment of cultures, positive environment of children and elderly. ( cost effective care )
  • Single parents positive or negative????
  • Reduction of crime, sexual diseases, less lonely depressed people,
  • Disadvantages:
    • Reducing freedom of individuals,
    • Transfer of genetic diseases.
  • Modernity has failed the families.



[1] Family culture: individuals enter voluntary care, co-operation in peace

3 comments:

Unknown said...

خوب نصفش رو خوندم و به نظرم هنوز اونقدر اطلاعات ندارم که بتونم روش نظرم رو بگم ...
مثل بچه ای که هر چیزی رو می خونه به نظرش درست میات و خوشش میات ... چون خیلی چیزارو نمی دونه ...
الان من این طوریم :D ...
ولی خوب واقعا جالب بود ...

fazu said...

بچه ها از اون چیزای خوششون میاد که خوبه......خونواده هم از اون چیزاس

Barion said...

I have read this again and I will throw my penny's worth as you asked....

I believe that there may be a number of things to consider as using the family "as a cell block" of the society. there are a number of historical elements in the development of family throughout which you have referred to some of them. Family structure has changed over the years. The the impact of which has been reciprocal; there has been as much influence on the family by hte environment (and by environment I mean all the outside factors within and outside the society adn its interactive influences) as well as the a returned influence on the environment by hte family. A more recent developmental view would be the theory of Transactional Model of behaviour and influence on the members of the family both individually as well as the collective impact. The recent progress in the communication has been an example of developmental relationships in this respect.

Another thing that probably needs to be considered is to produce a firm definition of family (this is becoming increasingly difficult) there is a deep differtence from what families are in the 'real' world and what one aspires for them to be. Consider a single gay man could constitute a family with all the legal and to a large extent, social protections that it may not have had before. The increasing credence given to seperation between husbands and wives, even in more traditional setting such as Iran, has produced a different meaning to the concept of family which includes more than just father and mother adn terms like biological father and step-mother ad so on are not as taboo as before. It seems to me that there are certain questions that needs to be researched and probably answered inthis regard:

Is family going to be considered as a building block? and if so to what extent it can or should be relied on as having the strength and the solidity to do that.

What exactly are the differences between an individualistic and pluralistic view of family and how these have changed over the years?

What are the implications of the communicational/technological developments on the family adn how these influences are manifested in present day 'family'?.........